Name of Comodities
| Author |
Message |
| 2006-02-22 9:40:43 |
Jonno wrote: BWR: I agree with your list, except papyrus. Papyrus is not the same in singular and plural! "Papyrus" is the singular/non-enumerable. "Papyri" is plural of the writing material. "Papyruses" is plural of the sedge.
Really! You've taught me something about English then. I was going by analogy with paper, I suppose, and was unfamiliar with Papyri. Nevertheless papyri is so uncommon that I, despite my college education (albeit in Agricuture) was unfamiliar with it. IMHO I think we'd be better off making an exception and staying with the singular form. I also prefer bone to bones as the plural implies the bones are the finished product to me. Again MHO. Gemstones sound fine.
|
|
BWR
Senior Member 

Joined: 2003-03-31 11:40:37 Posts: 79 Location: Central California USA
|
|
| 2006-02-22 11:08:40 |
I can confirm Jonno's statement on Papyri. I had always assumed it was spelled with a double i, like geeks like to pluralize things, before starting in on this discussion. I quite like it.
I also have an ever so slight preference for Bone, but I have no good reason for it. It just feels more, que digo, formal?
I for one will not make any bones about your list Jonno. Excellent work.
|
|
mcbeth
VIP 

Joined: 2003-07-01 15:19:33 Posts: 217 Location: USA
|
|
| 2006-02-22 15:57:23 |
BWR wrote: Jonno wrote: BWR: I agree with your list, except papyrus. Papyrus is not the same in singular and plural! "Papyrus" is the singular/non-enumerable. "Papyri" is plural of the writing material. "Papyruses" is plural of the sedge.
Really! You've taught me something about English then. I was going by analogy with paper, I suppose, and was unfamiliar with Papyri. Nevertheless papyri is so uncommon that I, despite my college education (albeit in Agriculture) was unfamiliar with it. IMHO I think we'd be better off making an exception and staying with the singular form. Papyrus is from Latin, paper is not... Papyri does sounds quite unfamiliar to me to, but not disturbingly so, and imho Papyri has a nicer, older (aka Latin), feel over it. Just an opinion though... BWR wrote: I also prefer bone to bones as the plural implies the bones are the finished product to me. Again MHO.
To me it just implies it's not a single (b)one, but then I'm better in English grammar than the English language overall.  My brain is just weird  BWR wrote: Gemstones sound fine.
OK mcbeth wrote: I can confirm Jonno's statement on Papyri. I had always assumed it was spelled with a double i, like geeks like to pluralize things, before starting in on this discussion. I quite like it.
Ah, you mean like virii, which by the way is properly (by bio-chemists) spelled viri, and is the science-latin plural of virus. (No plural existed in ancient Latin, as viruses wasn't known as anything more than "case of illness") So the current poll is "Papyri" +2, "Papyrus" +1 mcbeth wrote: I also have an ever so slight preference for Bone, but I have no good reason for it. It just feels more, que digo, formal?
As "bone" to me is plainly singular, and it would be the ONLY plainly singular if we kept it (all other singular forms is non-enumerables as well), I just can't stand it... That's my personal opinion though, and if most of you prefer Bone, I'll keep it. Current poll is "Bones" +1, "Bone" +1, Undesided +1 mcbeth wrote: I for one will not make any bones about your list Jonno. Excellent work.
Thanks
|
|
Jonno
Site Admin 

Joined: 2004-04-14 3:54:30 Posts: 556 Location: Linköping, Sweden
|
|
| 2006-02-23 9:56:40 |
Hello Jonno. If you feel strongly about bones, then by all means go with bones. You are the card master after all.  It's not a major issue for me but you asked for input. I suppose what I am trying to say is that when one has an item made of bone one usually says it's made of bone, not bones, even if it was made of more than one bone. I hope that makes sense. You've convinced me regarding papyri. Thanks
|
|
BWR
Senior Member 

Joined: 2003-03-31 11:40:37 Posts: 79 Location: Central California USA
|
|
| 2006-02-23 13:55:34 |
Sorry to be the antagonist on this one, but my votes go for "bone" and "papyrus" (for the same reason as "fish" and "fruit"). My votes also go for "fur", "hide", etc. as per my first post.  Perhaps Jonno should have a double-vote in case of ties, though? (If you want to make this democratic at all, that is.)
|
|
Pureblade
Senior Member 

Joined: 2004-01-01 11:31:34 Posts: 50 Location: Norway
|
|
| 2006-02-23 14:15:27 |
Jonno wrote: Pureblade wrote: I'm not sure if you meant that to be an exception to BWR's rule or not, but if you did I disagree. Wine, used in this context is not enumerable (because the meaning of it would change when the plural is used, I suppose?). I.e. you can say "I'm going to buy wine" when you mean "I'm going to buy a bottle of wine", but you cannot say "I'm going to buy wines" when you mean "I'm going to buy several bottles of wine". In this sense, 'bottle' is enumerable, but 'wine' (meaning a bottle of wine) is not. Did that make sense? (I'm just a confused Norwegian, you know.  ) I meant this to be an exception to BWR's rule, as Wine is a final product, and according to his rule should be in plural (eg. Wine s) No, his rule was "If it is a more or less finished product and is enumerable use the plural". It seems you didn't take in the latter condition in your analysis. And "wine" in the implied CivProject meaning is not enumerable (see below). That's what I tried to point out in the original post, but seeing as I'm not a native speaker/writer, I probably didn't articulate it well enough. If you read my post again with this in mind, perhaps it will make more sense?  You're arguing, however, that "wine" is enumerable, but then you're talking about a different meaning of wine. So, I guess "wine" can be interpreted in two ways - one that's enumerable and one that's not. In CivProject, I think it's obvious that we mean "wine as a resource" (non-enumerable) and not "one kind of wine" (enumerable) when we print "wine" on the trade card. Agree? And anyways, as has been pointed out, it's not important as we all agree on the card text. I just wanted to clarify what I meant. 
|
|
Pureblade
Senior Member 

Joined: 2004-01-01 11:31:34 Posts: 50 Location: Norway
|
|
| 2006-02-23 15:05:28 |
Pureblade wrote: Sorry to be the antagonist on this one, but my votes go for "bone" and "papyrus" (for the same reason as "fish" and "fruit"). My votes also go for "fur", "hide", etc. as per my first post.  Perhaps Jonno should have a double-vote in case of ties, though? (If you want to make this democratic at all, that is.) Well, "fish" and "fruit" are actually used as non-enumerables IRL, which (to my knowledge) neither "fur" nor "hide" are. (Or rather, fur can be a non-enumerable, but then you refer to just the fury hair, not the hide part that keeps it together as separate items.) Yes, my intention was to go democratic, with me breaking any ties. Which is why I actually try to convince all of you that I'm right.... Of course Velusion might always overrule any decisions I make, as my new template won't go official without his approval. Current poll: Hides +3, Hide +1 Bones +1, Bone +2 Papyri +3, Papyrus +1, Papyruses +0 Furs +3, Fur +1 Spice +2, Spices +0 Gemstones +2, Gems +0 Pearls +3, Pearl +1
|
|
Jonno
Site Admin 

Joined: 2004-04-14 3:54:30 Posts: 556 Location: Linköping, Sweden
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|