Civilization: The Expansion Project

A strategy game inspired by Advanced Civilization™


All times are UTC


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Question on Metalworking
Author Message
Post Question on Metalworking
Hello,

it's me again with a further question. I hope, I'm not getting on your nerves...

This time it's about Metalworking:

Quote:
In conflicts, a player with Metalworking always remove his token after all other players without Metalworking have removed theirs, even though the other player(s) may have larger forces.


Again with an example:
Player A has 5 tokens and Player B has 2 tokens in an area with population limit 4. So totally 7 tokens (3 to much).
Normally, Player B would have to reduce 2 tokens and Player A 1 token.
Now, player B is in possesion of Metalworking (A is not), so player A has to begin reducing tokens.
The explanation speaks about always removing tokens after all other players. How is this exactly meant?
1) A removes 3 tokens, B zero tokens.
2) A removes one, B removes one, A removes one.

Because the explanation says his token and not his tokens, I think it has to be (2). But I am not sure.


Thanks for your help,
Michael


Junior Member
Profile
Send private message
Joined:
2007-05-01 18:10:29
Posts:
9
Location:
Ulm, South Germany
Post 
Quote:
Player A has 5 tokens and Player B has 2 tokens in an area with population limit 4. So totally 7 tokens (3 to much).
Normally, Player B would have to reduce 2 tokens and Player A 1 token.
Now, player B is in possesion of Metalworking (A is not), so player A has to begin reducing tokens.
The explanation speaks about always removing tokens after all other players. How is this exactly meant?
1) A removes 3 tokens, B zero tokens.
2) A removes one, B removes one, A removes one.

Because the explanation says his token and not his tokens, I think it has to be (2). But I am not sure.


I think it is case (2) as it is in Civilization and Advanced Civilization.


New Member
Profile
Send private message
Joined:
2007-05-07 14:32:10
Posts:
3
Location:
Germany
Post 
Case 2, same as Civ & AdvCiv


VIP
Profile
Send private message
Joined:
2003-07-01 15:19:33
Posts:
217
Location:
USA
Post Re: Question on Metalworking
Michael wrote:
Again with an example:
Player A has 5 tokens and Player B has 2 tokens in an area with population limit 4. So totally 7 tokens (3 to much).
Normally, Player B would have to reduce 2 tokens and Player A 1 token.
Now, player B is in possesion of Metalworking (A is not), so player A has to begin reducing tokens.
The explanation speaks about always removing tokens after all other players. How is this exactly meant?
1) A removes 3 tokens, B zero tokens.
2) A removes one, B removes one, A removes one.

Because the explanation says his token and not his tokens, I think it has to be (2). But I am not sure.

You are correct, interpretation two is the one intended. §18.24 does not trumph the alternately removing of tokens, only the order they do it in. The language is complicated as it must cover the case when there are 3 nations in an area, where two players have metalworking, and one doesn't, and similar unusual but possible scenarios. I'll look through it and see if I can clarify the section though.


Site Admin
Profile
Send private message
Joined:
2004-04-14 3:54:30
Posts:
556
Location:
Linköping, Sweden
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
CivProject phpBB3 template by Jon Severinsson
Based on Revolution Pro phpBB3 template by Brian Gardner Media, LLC