
Re: Clarification of Tribal Conflict
What reasoning are you following when you involve another player in the rules, when the rules only states that a land border must be common between two areas (eg a land border that is a land border for both areas, eg the two areas are adjacent).
Other parts of the rules does speak of a land border that is common between two players (eg a land border that is a land border for both players), but as 28.731 doesn't mention another player, there is no way to infer "common to two players", when the rules explicitly says "areas sharing a common land border".