| Civilization: The Expansion Project https://dev.civproject.net/forum/ |
|
| Coastal areas, take 2 https://dev.civproject.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=144 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | busybody [ 2004-07-10 11:09:37 ] |
| Post subject: | |
> 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and > can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an open sea zone. > The exceptions to this would be regions that border the Caspian > or Arial Seas (Caucasus, Dihistan, Lesser Armenia, Media, > Hecatompylos, Nisa, and Chorasmia) I think the terrority list is for an earlier version of the map - it needs to include: Caspian: Alani, Ustiurt, Nalchik Arial (Aral?): Sogdiana However, this feels too "special case" for the rules. How about this instead? 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an area which has a water-only boundary. That would remove the special-case listing of specific areas, but would make the Aral sea *not* coastal. 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an area which has a water-only boundary. Areas which have a water boundary on a map-edge are considered coastal as well. That would include the Aral sea, but would cause one problem. The area labled "Eastern Himalaya" has a small tiny lake which in split on the map edge, meaning it would be coastal as well. Coastal vs not-coastal has effects on using ships (which aren't needed on the Aral - but could spend down treasury), or city sites which are vulnerable to piracy. The two areas are a 4 and 2 neither which are natural city sites. The 4 would be horribly inefficent to use as a wilderness city and the 2 borders a zero-pop and would be barbarian bait. I'm thinking that making the Aral non-coastal isn't a great loss. My suggestion: 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an area which has a water-only boundary. |
|
| Author: | Velusion [ 2004-07-12 18:59:32 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Agreed! Something with an example would probably help like: 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an area which has a water-only boundary (such as the Caspian Sea). busybody wrote: > 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and > can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an open sea zone. > The exceptions to this would be regions that border the Caspian > or Arial Seas (Caucasus, Dihistan, Lesser Armenia, Media, > Hecatompylos, Nisa, and Chorasmia) I think the terrority list is for an earlier version of the map - it needs to include: Caspian: Alani, Ustiurt, Nalchik Arial (Aral?): Sogdiana However, this feels too "special case" for the rules. How about this instead? 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an area which has a water-only boundary. That would remove the special-case listing of specific areas, but would make the Aral sea *not* coastal. 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an area which has a water-only boundary. Areas which have a water boundary on a map-edge are considered coastal as well. That would include the Aral sea, but would cause one problem. The area labled "Eastern Himalaya" has a small tiny lake which in split on the map edge, meaning it would be coastal as well. Coastal vs not-coastal has effects on using ships (which aren't needed on the Aral - but could spend down treasury), or city sites which are vulnerable to piracy. The two areas are a 4 and 2 neither which are natural city sites. The 4 would be horribly inefficent to use as a wilderness city and the 2 borders a zero-pop and would be barbarian bait. I'm thinking that making the Aral non-coastal isn't a great loss. My suggestion: 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an area which has a water-only boundary. |
|
| Author: | Jonno [ 2004-07-13 10:59:57 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Included in 2.05. Velusion wrote: Agreed! Something with an example would probably help like: 4.24 Coastal areas are areas that contain both land and water and can trace back a path, strictly over water, to an area which has a water-only boundary (such as the Caspian Sea). |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|